Tuesday, 1 December 2015

Rajah Brooke’s Birdwing (Trogonoptera brookiana)

Rajah Brooke’s Birdwing (Trogonoptera brookiana)
Rajah Brooke’s Birdwing is a distinctive black and electric-green birdwing butterfly from the rainforests in the Thai-Malay Peninsula, Borneo, Natuna, Sumatra, and various small islands west of Sumatra.

Trogonoptera brookiana

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Raja Brooke's Birdwing
Trogonoptera brookiana 0588.JPG
Adult male (above) and female ventral surfaces
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Lepidoptera
Family: Papilionidae
Genus: Trogonoptera
Species: T. brookiana
Binomial name
Trogonoptera brookiana
Wallace, 1855
Synonyms
  • Troides brookiana
Rajah Brooke's Birdwing (Trogonoptera brookiana) is a distinctive black and electric-green birdwing butterfly from the rainforests in the Thai-Malay Peninsula, Borneo, Natuna, Sumatra, and various small islands west of Sumatra (Banyak, Simeulue, Batu and Mentawai).[1][2] The butterfly was named by the naturalist Alfred R. Wallace in 1855, after James Brooke, the Rajah of Sarawak.[2]
The larval host plants are Aristolochia acuminata and A. foveolata.[3] Adults sip flower nectar from plants such as Bauhinia.[2]
Rajah Brooke's Birdwing is a protected species, listed under Appendix II of CITES,[3][4] meaning that international export is restricted to those who have been granted a permit.
It is the national butterfly of Malaysia.[5]

Description

Both sexes resemble the more restricted relative, the Palawan Birdwing, but males of Rajah Brooke's Birdwing have more green to the rear wings. The wingspan of Rajah Brooke's Birdwing is 15–17 cm (5.9–6.7 in).[3]
The wings of males are mainly black. Each forewing has seven teeth-shaped electric-green markings, while there is a relatively large electric-green patch on the hindwings. The head is bright red and the body is black with red markings. The wings of females are browner with prominent white flashes at the tips of the forewings and at the base of the hindwings.[3]

Taxonomy

genus: Trogonoptera Rippon, 1890
  • Trogonoptera brookiana Wallace, 1855
Trogonoptera brookiana brookiana (Wallace, 1855)
Trogonoptera brookiana brookiana f. brookiana Wallace, 1855
Trogonoptera brookiana brookiana f. julijae S.Hu, 2007
Trogonoptera brookiana toshikii Kobayashi, 1991
Trogonoptera brookiana akikoa Morita, 1994

Illustrations

Crimson Rose swallowtail butterfly (Pachliopta hector)

WIKI: It is a very striking looking tailed butterfly with prominent white bands on its forewings. Like the Common Rose, this butterfly is also very interesting for the amateur naturalist to observe. The Crimson Rose is very fond of flowers, especially Lantana.Nectar appears to be essential for the butterfly and a higher nectar intake is thought to increase egg production.

Pachliopta hector

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Crimson rose
Pachliopta hector.jpg
Male in typical basking pose
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Lepidoptera
Family: Papilionidae
Genus: Pachliopta
Species: P. hector
Binomial name
Pachliopta hector[1]
(Linnaeus, 1758)[1]
Synonyms
Atrophaneura hector
Crimson Rose (Pachliopta hector) Female from TATR
The crimson rose (Pachliopta hector) is a large swallowtail butterfly belonging to the genus Pachliopta (roses) of the red-bodied swallowtails.

Range

It is found in India and Sri Lanka and possibly the coast of western Myanmar.
In India, it is found in the Western Ghats, southern India (Kerala), eastern India (West Bengal and Odisha). It is a straggler in the Andaman Islands.[2]

Status

Generally common and not known to be threatened.[citation needed] It is common all along the Western Ghats up to Maharashtra but rare in Gujarat.[citation needed] Protected by law in India.[citation needed]

Description

The male's upperside is black. Fore wing with a broad white interrupted band from the subcostal nervure opposite the origin of veins 10 and 11, extended obliquely to the tornus, and a second short pre-apical similar band; both bands composed of detached irregularly indented broad streaks in the interspaces. Hind wing with a diseal posteriorly strongly curved series of seven crimson spots followed by a subterminal series of crimson lunules. Cilia black alternated with white. Underside: fore whig dull brownish black, hind wing black; markings as on the npporsido, but the crimson spots and crescentic markings on the hind wing larger. Antennae, thorax and abdomen abovo at base, black; head and rest of the abdomen bright crimson; beneath: iho palpi, the sides of the thorax and abdomen crimson.
The female is similar, the discal series of spots and subterminal lunules much duller, pale crimson irrorated with black scales; in some specimens the anterior spots and lunules almost white barely tinged with crimson; abdomen above with the black colour extended further towards the apex.[3]
No geographic races have been described.

Habitat

This butterfly is at home both in jungle and in open country. During the dry season, it will be found up to 8000 feet (2400 m) in South India, but it is found all the year round at lower elevations.

Habits

Female crimson rose nectar-feeding on Lantana
It is a very striking tailed butterfly with prominent white bands on its forewings. The crimson rose is very fond of flowers especially Lantana. Nectar appears to be essential for the butterfly and a higher nectar intake is thought to increase egg production.
Close to the ground, the flight of the crimson rose is slow and fluttering but steady. At greater heights, it flies faster and stronger. It basks with its wings spread flat, sometimes in small congregations at heights of 10 to 15 metres up in the trees.
The butterfly often roosts for the night in large companies on the twigs and branches of trees and shrubs, sometimes accompanied by a few common Mormons. When resting the butterfly draws its forewings halfway between the hindwings. The butterfly sleeps on slanting outstretched branches or twigs of trees or bushes.

Aposematism and mimicry

Common Mormon Papilio polytes (female romulus form) mimic of crimson rose
The red body, slow peculiar flight, bright colouration and pattern of the wings are meant to indicate to predators that this butterfly is inedible, being well protected by the poisons it has sequestered from its larval food plant. Its flight and behaviour is much like that of the common Mormon. Like that butterfly, it too is inedible and rarely attacked by predators. This has led to this butterfly also being mimicked by a female morph of the common Mormon (Papilio polytes), in this case, the female form romulus.

Migration

The most striking aspect of the butterfly's behaviour is its strong migratory tendencies. During the peak of its season, several thousands of crimson roses can be found congregating and then they begin migrating to other areas.
In the Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 1880, p. 276, Mr. R. S. Eaton notes that in Bombay this butterfly roosted in great numbers together, however Bingham notes that in the Western Ghats between Vengurla and Belgaum, where the butterfly occurred in some numbers and had the habit of roosting in company on twigs of some thorny shrub, but never saw more than a score or so together.[3]

Life cycle

Higher numbers of them are seen during August–November and also during April–June. They breed up to seven times in the year and it has been found to take only 39–47 days from egg to adult.

Eggs

Similar to those of the common rose, the eggs hatch in seven days.

Caterpillars

The caterpillars of the crimson rose are similar to those of the common rose, but are purplish-black or blackish-brown. They have a black head and orange osmeterium. Their bodies are fat, with orange-red tubercles and a prominent yellowish-white band transeversely placed on segments six to eight. The caterpillar has five instars. The caterpillars are known to display cannibalistic behaviour. Hence the name hector.

Pupa

The pupa is pinkish brown with darker expanded wing-cases. The wing like expansions on the abdomen are distinctive.

Food plants

The larvae of the species breed on various species of Aristolochia including Aristolochia indica, Aristolochia bracteolata, and Thottea siliquosa. The species is unpalatable as they sequester chemical compounds in their larval stages including aristolochic acid from the host plants.[4]

Nectar resources

The nectar sources of the crimson rose with details of the flowering period are as follows :
  • Adathoda zeylonica January–March
  • Albizzia lebbeck March–June
  • Anacardium occidentale December–March
  • Antigonon leptopus year-long
  • Bougainvillea spectabilis year-long
  • Caesalpinia pulcherrima year-long
  • Capparis spinosa December–February
  • Carissa carandus year-long (April–July)
  • Catharanthus roseus year-long
  • Citheroxylum subserratum April–June
  • Clerodendrum infortunatum February–April
  • Duranta repens June–December
  • Hibiscus rosa-sinensis year-long
  • Hyptis suaveolens September–January
  • Jasminum angustifolium June–August
  • Lantana camara year-long
  • Muntingia calabura year-long
  • Nerium odorum year-long
  • Premna latifolia March–August
  • Sida acuta August–December
  • Sida cordifolia August–December
  • Stachytarpheta indica June–September
  • Wrightia tinctoria April–June
  • Zizyphus oenoplia August–December and March–June

Etymology

In common with other early naturalists Liinaeus followed the classical tradition. The name honours the Greek hero Hector.

See also

Cited references

  1. Häuser, Christoph L.; de Jong, Rienk; Lamas, Gerardo; Robbins, Robert K.; Smith, Campbell; Vane-Wright, Richard I. (28 July 2005). "Papilionidae – revised GloBIS/GART species checklist (2nd draft)". Entomological Data Information System. Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Germany. Retrieved 21 June 2013.
  2. Cotton, Adam; Fric, Zdenek Faltynek; Smith, Colin & Smetacek, Peter (March 2013). "Subspecies catalogue of the butterflies of India (Papilionidae): A Synopsis". Bionotes 15 (1): 5–8.
  3. Bingham, C. T. 1907. Fauna of British India. Butterflies. Volume 2
  4. Sime K.R., Feeny, P.P. and Haribal, M.M. (2000) Sequestration of aristolochic acids by the pipevine swallowtail, Battus philenor (L.): evidence and ecological implications. Chemoecology 10:169–178 [1]

References

  • Collins, N.M. & Morris, M.G. (1985). Threatened Swallowtail Butterflies of the World. IUCN. ISBN 2-88032-603-6
  • Evans, W.H. (1932). The Identification of Indian Butterflies. (2nd Ed). Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai, India
  • Gaonkar, Harish (1996). Butterflies of the Western Ghats, India (including Sri Lanka) - A Biodiversity Assessment of a threatened mountain system. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society.
  • Gay, Thomas; Kehimkar, Isaac & Punetha, J.C. (1992). Common Butterflies of India. WWF-India and Oxford University Press, Mumbai, India.
  • Kunte, Krushnamegh (2005). Butterflies of Peninsular India. Universities Press.
  • Wynter-Blyth, M.A. (1957). Butterflies of the Indian Region. Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai, India.

Red-Spotted Apollo Butterfly (Parnassius apollo)

WIKI: This species is of interest to entomologists due to the variety of subspecies, often only restricted to a specific valley in the Alps. The beautiful Apollo butterfly has long been prized by collectors, who aim to possess as many of the variants as possible.
The Apollo or Mountain Apollo (Parnassius apollo), is a butterfly of the Papilionidae family.

Conservation

This species is of interest to entomologists due to the variety of subspecies, often only restricted to a specific valley in the Alps. The beautiful Apollo butterfly has long been prized by collectors, who aim to possess as many of the variants as possible. While over-collecting is believed to have caused populations to decline in some areas, such as in Spain and Italy, habitat change is thought to be a far more significant threat to this species’ survival.[1] Plantations of conifers, the succession of suitable habitat to scrubland, agriculture, and urbanization have all reduced the habitat of the Apollo butterfly. Climate change and acid rain have also been implicated in this species decline in Fennoscandia. In addition, motor vehicles have been cited as a cause of Apollo butterfly mortalities; vehicles on a motorway system near Bozen in South Tyrol, Italy, are said to have nearly wiped out a race of the Apollo.[1]
In Finland, the Apollo was one of the first species of insects declared endangered. The Apollo population in Finland and Sweden decreased drastically during the 1950s. The reason for this is not known, but it is commonly thought to be because of a disease. In Sweden, it is now restricted to areas that have limestone in the ground, suggesting that the decrease could hypothetically be related to acid rain.[2]
Laws exist to protect the Apollo butterfly in many countries. The Apollo is on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals,[3] in Appendix II in CITES .[1][4] and is mentioned in annex IV of Habitats Directive. It is protected in other states: the Principality of Liechtenstein, Czech Republic (as critically threatened species in Czech code, Decree for implementation, No. 395/1992 Sb., and No. 175/2006 Sb.), Turkey and Poland.
However, these laws focus on the protection of individuals, rather than their habitat, and so may do little to mitigate the greatest threat that populations face.[1] Fortunately, there are a number of projects specifically working to save this Vulnerable insect. A conservation programme in Pieniny National Park saved a subspecies of the Apollo butterfly that had declined to just 20 individuals in the early 1990s, through a combination of captive breeding and habitat protection.[5] In south-west Germany, conservationists are working with shepherds to ensure favourable conditions for the butterfly, which share their grassland habitat with sheep. For example, grazing periods have been shifted to avoid the Apollo butterfly larvae stage, which is vulnerable to being trampled.[6]
The Apollo butterfly has many subspecies around the world, and some European subspecies are showing an alarming decline in numbers. This is mainly caused by habitat destruction, air pollution affecting the insect's food plants, and butterfly collectors. The Apollo butterfly is also more vulnerable to predators as it spends two years as a caterpillar.

Color Polymorphism in the Parnassius apollo

Parnassius apollo
Larva

Color Variation

The Apollo butterfly (Parnassius apollo) is a beautiful white butterfly, decorated with large black "eye" spots on the forewings and red eye-spots on the hindwings.[7] These striking red eye-spots can vary in size and form depending on the location of the Apollo butterfly, and the bright red colour often fades in the sun, causing the eye-spots of older individuals to appear more orange.[1] The wings are shiny, with slightly transparent edges,[4] and some individuals are darker (melanistic); a general phenomenon common in many butterflies. The caterpillars of this species are velvety black with orange-red spots along the sides.[7] As well as being a great deal of individual variation in the appearance of the Apollo butterfly, a number of subspecies have also been described.
  • Parnassius apollo apollo
  • Parnassius apollo alpherakyi Krulikowsky, 1906
  • Parnassius apollo bartholomaeus Stichel, 1899
  • Parnassius apollo democratus Kulikowsky, 1906
  • Parnassius apollo filabricus Sagarra, 1933 (Sierra de los Filabres)
  • Parnassius apollo gadorensis Rougeot & Capdeville, 1969 (Sierra de Gádor)
  • Parnassius apollo geminus Schawerda, 1907
  • Parnassius apollo graecus Ziegler, 1901
  • Parnassius apollo hesebolus Nordmann, 1851
  • Parnassius apollo hispanicus Oberthür, 1909 (Spain)
  • Parnassius apollo limicola Stichel, 1906
  • Parnassius apollo merzbacheri Fruhstorfer, 1906
  • Parnassius apollo nevadensis Oberthür, 1891 (Sierra Nevada)
  • Parnassius apollo provincialis Kheil, 1905
  • Parnassius apollo pyrenaica Harcourt-Bath, 1896
  • Parnassius apollo rhodopensis Markowitsch, 1910 (Greece, Balkans)
  • Parnassius apollo rhaeticus Fruhstorfer, 1906
  • Parnassius apollo rhea (Poda, 1761)
  • Parnassius apollo rubidus Fruhstorfer, 1906
  • Parnassius apollo sibiricus Nordmann, 1851
  • Parnassius apollo sicilae Oberthür, 1891
  • Parnassius apollo valesiacus Fruhstorfer, 1906
  • Parnassius apollo vinningensis Stichel, 1899 (Moselle, Duitsland)
[8] For a more complete list of subspecies and type details of specimens in the British Museum (Natural History) see Ackery, P. R. (1973) A list of the type-specimens of Parnassius (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in the British Museum (Natural History). Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Ent.) 29 (1) (9.XI.1973): 1—35, 1 pl. online here

Distribution of Color Variation

The drastic climate change of the Pleistocene era forced a separation of the Red Apollo butterfly population. This in turn played a role in creating the distinct color changes seen in the species.The Parnassius apollo became divided and isolated in the Eurasian region during the glacial period. The large glaciers created a physical barrier between the population, barring interaction between the groups. Still within these isolated populations the butterflies migrated westward into portions of southern Europe where they settled and reproduced. Within all of these particular isolated populations there is also variation in the wing color allele.[9] There is variation in size between the isolated populations. With the larger separated populations of butterflies these habitats are used to sustain populations with larger amount of resources. These larger populations are called metapopulations and with the smaller separated sub-populations they create a mainland-island system. The Parnassius apollo can migrate from habitats and thus create a variation seen in each isolated population.[10]

Distribution Pattern Effects on Survival Rate of Parnassius apollo

New environmental pressures lead to the selection of a better suited color variant within these isolated populations. With this variety there is a correlation with extinction. In high variation environments there is cause for extinction in greater numbers of individuals. For example there is high variation in the Swiss Alps and presently there is a high rate of individuals becoming extinct.[11] One of the probable causes of extinction is the warming of the climate. It is said that the Red apollo is an “atypical glacial invader” and that with the warming of the climate in mountainous regions is causing the butterfly to not readily adapt to such an uncomfortable environment.[9] Another possible cause of extinction is the interesting connection between nectar plant distribution and the Parnassius apollo. If there was present a constraint of migration from nectar plant populations to another the Red Apollo’s population would slowly dissipate and reproduction might seize. This is because the outcrop of the nectar plants are the sight of reproduction and if the spatial structure is too far for the butterfly to migrate to the dynamics of the population is in danger.[10]

Ecology

Adult Apollo butterflies are seen on the wing in mid-summer,[4] feeding on nectar produced by flowers.[12] The females lay eggs, which over-winter and hatch in spring the following year.[1] The resulting caterpillars feed on stonecrop (Sedum species) and houseleek (Sempervivum species).[7] When the caterpillar is fully-grown it will pupate on the ground, forming a loose cocoon from which the adult butterfly emerges following metamorphosis.[4]
Related species can be found all over the world. The "Small Apollo" (Parnassius phoebus) is found in the high mountains while the Clouded Apollo (Parnassius mnemosyne) lives in the valleys. The Apollo caterpillar lives on larkspur and rock plants and is a velvety blue-black with small orange spots.

Distribution and habitat

Habitat of Parnassius apollo. La Thuile, Italy at abt. 2700 a.s.l.
This typically mountain species prefers flowery meadows and pastures of the continental European mountains, in Spain, Scandinavia and Central Europe, in the Balkans up to northern Greece and in the Alps between Italy and France.[9]
It is also present in some areas of the central Asia. Typical of high altitudes, its range is from 400 metres (1,300 ft) up to 2,300 metres (7,500 ft), although it is far more present above 1,000 metres (3,300 ft).
This species requires specific climatic conditions (cold winter, sunny summer). It also requires wide open spaces (with a cover of shrubs less than 5%) and a large surface of lawns (at least 50%). The presence of the host plant for the caterpillars is critical.

Predation and defensive strategy

The Apollo butterfly shares a variety of defensive strategies with quite a few species of butterflies. Even from a young age larva exhibit camouflage by being entirely black. This solid color helps them avoid detection even at a close distance. However, as they mature, they lose this advantage by developing two rows of orange dots. These dots greatly decrease the amount of crypsis.[13] In addition to this larval camouflage, the larva also shares in a form of Müllerian mimicry with a type of millipede, glomeris guttata. Both insects share the characteristic orange spots and black body and a common habitat. The millipedes and caterpillars secrete a foul smelling odor to repel predators.[13]
Once the butterfly completes its metamorphosis, it has a number of defensive mechanisms in place to avoid predation. One of the most easily identifiable traits is the bright eyespots found on the wings. These eyespots are essentially concentric circle of a wide variety of colors. Apart from the wide range of colors, eyespots are very limited in their plasticity. There are three main hypothesis to why these spots may have developed; they resemble the eyes of an enemy of the predator in order to intimidate them, they draw the attention of the predator to less vital components of the butterfly’s body, or the spots are there simply to surprise the predator. The only disadvantage to these spots is that they cause the butterfly to be a great deal more conspicuous.[14]
Another form of defense is the taste of the butterfly. Similar to the Monarch butterfly, the Apollo butterfly produces a repulsive taste to its predator. The butterfly seems to get this foul taste from its plant host, the sedum stenopetalum. There is a bitter tasting cyanoglucoside, sarmentonsin, which is found in both the butterfly and the plant. There is a much higher concentration of sarmentonsin found in the wings as opposed to the rest of the body.[15] The high concentration found in the wings indicates that the wings of the butterfly would taste much worse comparatively. A common predator, nesting water pipits, have evolved a strategy to avoid the poor taste of the butterfly. It has been observed that the bird will remove the wings before consuming the body.[16] In theory, this will get rid of the poor tasting elements of the butterfly, leaving only the nutritious body.

Etymology

The species is named in the classical tradition for the deity Apollo.

References

This article incorporates text from the ARKive fact-file "Apollo butterfly" under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License and the GFDL.
  1. Collins, N.M. and Morris, M.G. (1985) Threatened Swallowtail Butterflies of the World. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
  2. Lars-Åke Janzon (February 7, 2009). "Mer om apollofjäril" (in Swedish). Naturhistoriska riksmuseet.
  3. Gimenez Dixon (1996). "Parnassius apollo". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.2. International Union for Conservation of Nature. Retrieved May 11, 2006.
  4. Still, J. (1996) Butterflies and Moths of Britain and Europe. Harper Collins, London.
  5. Witkowsky, Z., Budzik, J. and Kosior, A. (1992) Restoration of the Apollo butterfly in Pieniny National Park. Chrońmy Przyrodę Ojczystą, 1992: 3-4.
  6. Dolek, M.; Geyer, A. (2002). "Conserving biodiversity on calcareous grasslands in the Franconian Jura by grazing: a comprehensive approach". Biological Conservation 104: 351–360. doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00200-2.
  7. Carter, D. (2000) Butterflies and Moths. Dorling Kindersley, London.
  8. Smart, P. (1975) The Illustrated Encyclopedia of the Butterfly World. Hamlyn Publishing Group Ltd, London.
  9. Todisco, Valentina; Gratton, Paolo; Cesaroni, Donatella; Sbordoni, Valerio. "Phylogeography of Parnassius Apollo: Hints on Taxonomy and Conservation of a Vulnerable Glacial Butterfly Invader". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 101 (1): 178. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01476.x. Retrieved 24 October 2014.
  10. Brommer, Jon; Fred, Marianne (2001). "Movement of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo related to host plant and nectar plant patches". Ecological Entomology 24 (2): 125–131. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2311.1999.00190.x.
  11. Habel, Jan; Reuter, Manuela; Drees, Claudia; Pfaender, Jobst (2012). "Does Isolation Affect Phenotypic Variability and Fluctuating Asymmetry in the Endangered Red Apollo?". J Insect Conservation 16: 571–579. doi:10.1007/s10841-011-9442-3.
  12. Fred, M.S.; O'Hara, R.B.; Brommer, J.E. (2006). "Consequences of the spatial configuration of resources for the distribution and dynamics of the endangered Parnassius apollo butterfly". Biological Conservation 130: 183–192. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.12.012.
  13. Descimon, H., and M. Deschamps-Cottin. "A Possible Case of Mimicry in the Caterpillar of Parnassius Apollo (L.) (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)." Linneana Belgica 15.8 (1996): 309-10. Print.
  14. Stevens, Martin. "The Role of Eyespots as Anti-predator Mechanisms, Principally Demonstrated in the Lepidoptera." Biological Reviews 80.04 (2005): 573.
  15. Nishida, R., and M. Rothschild. "A Cyanoglucoside Stored by ASedum-feeding Apollo Butterfly,Parnassius Phoebus." Experientia 51.3 (1995): 267-69.
  16. Hendricks, P. A. U. L."Avian predation of alpine butterflies." Journal of the Lepidopterists Society 40.2 (1986): 129.

Further reading

  • Parnassius gallery, including many subspecies of Parnassius apollo
  • Xavier Mérit and Véronique Mérit: Les Parnassius de France, textes de Xavier Mérit-Véronique Mérit et Henri Descimon, cartes de répartition, planches, et photos en nature de Luc Manil, Xavier Mérit et Bernard Turlin, bibliographies, Bulletin des Lépidoptéristes parisiens, Volume 15 (2006), n°33 (numéro thématique), Paris, septembre 2006 (56 pages).
  • Pierre Capdeville, 1978–1980, Les races géographiques de Parnassius apollo, 191 p - 26 tables - maps - 24 plates in colours, Sciences Nat, Venette.
  • Jean-Claude Weiss : The Parnassiinae of the World, Pt. 4, 2005, Hillside Books, Canterbury. [1]
  • Edwin Möhn, 2005 Schmetterlinge der Erde, Butterflies of the world Part 23 Papilionidae XII. Parnassius apollo. Edited by Erich Bauer and Thomas Frankenbach Keltern : Goecke & Evers ; Canterbury : Hillside Books. ISBN 9783937783161

Amazing and Unusual Butterflies




Golden Marking Swallowtail Butterfly (Teinopalpus imperialis)
WIKI: The Kaiser-i-Hind is a rare species of swallowtail butterfly found from Nepal and north India east to north Vietnam. The common name literally means “Emperor of India”

Kaiser-i-Hind
Teinopalpus imperialis verso.JPG
Teinopalpus imperialis, ventral side of male
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Lepidoptera
Family: Papilionidae
Genus: Teinopalpus
Species: T. imperialis
Binomial name
Teinopalpus imperialis
Hope, 1843
The Kaiser-i-Hind (Teinopalpus imperialis) is a rare species of swallowtail butterfly found from Nepal and north India east to north Vietnam. The common name literally means "Emperor of India". The Kaiser-i-hind is much sought after by butterfly collectors for its beauty and rarity.[citation needed] The green iridiscence of the wings has been found to be due to three-dimensional photonic structure of the scales and is the subject of much research.[2]

Description

See glossary for terms used
The Kaiser-i-hind, like the Bhutan Glory is unmistakable and cannot be confused with any other butterfly. A predominantly green swallowtail, the male has a bright
The following descriptions are from Bingham, C. T (1907) The Fauna of British India, Including Ceylon and Burma. Butterflies Volume 2.

Male

Teinopalpus imperialis male
Upperside black, densely irrorated with green scales. Forewing: an outwardly oblique, slightly concave subbasal band and a narrow terminal edging jet-black due to the ground-colour there being devoid of the green scaling; beyond the subbasal band the irroration of scales a much brighter green, especially along the outer edge of the subbasal band itself; but along obscure, broad and convergent discal and postdiscal transverse bands and along a subterminal much narrower band, the green scaling thins out and the black ground-colour of the wing shows through; in some specimens, owing to the transparency of the wings, the rich ochraceous-brown colour of the underside gives the black on these bands a reddish tint. Hind wing: basal area margined outwardly by a narrow irregularly sinuous band devoid of green scaling, succeeded by an upper discal bright chrome-yellow patch that spreads from base of interspace 3 across the apex of the cell and bases of interspaces 4 and 5 to the costa; this patch is bluntly angulated outwards in interspace 5, stained with orange anteriorly and bordered outwardly by black which is widest above; below the patch a white line extends to the dorsum; the postdiscal area is deep dark green, margined inwardly by diffuse dark grey and followed outwardly by a subterminal series of lunular markings, the tornal and upper two or three of which are yellow, the rest bright green; tail tipped with yellow. Underside: basal area of both fore and hind wings densely covered with green scales. Forewing: terminal two-thirds rich ochraceous brown, the green of the basal area bordered by black; discal and postdiscal bands also black, widened and diffusely coalescent posteriorly; an incomplete, very slender subterminal black line and broader black terminal edging, neither of which reaches to the apex. Hindwing much as on the upperside, but the yellow marking broader. Antennae dark red; head, thorax and abdomen black, covered somewhat densely with green hairs and scales.

Female

Teinopalpus imperialis female
Much larger, differs also in coloration and markings as follows: Upperside, forewings: the irroration of green scales on the terminal two-thirds restricted to a sub-terminal moderately broad band diffuse along its inner edge, and a medial somewhat ill-defined similar band that is bordered both on the inner and outer sides by diffuse dusky black; this is succeeded by two broad diffuse transverse dark grey bands, the outer of the two edged on its outer side narrowly with black, followed by a subterminal green band and terminal velvety-black margin. Hindwing: the upper discal yellow patch so conspicuous in the male, replaced by a very much larger dark grey patch, below which comparatively narrow markings of yellow extend up to the dorsum; a postdiscal sinuous lunular narrow black band and a subterminal series of green lunules as in the male, but the apical lunule dark grey, not yellow; the tail-like extensions of the termen at the apices of veins 3 to 6 are black shaded with green, those at the apices of veins 4 and 6 tipped, the former with yellow the latter with greenish-white. Underside similar to the underside in the male, but on both fore and hind wing the areas coloured with rich ochraceous and yellow are grey, with the exception of a well-marked moderately broad subterminal band on the forewing which is of a dull ochraceous colour; on the hindwing the grey discal area extends right up to the apical lunule of the subterminal series. Antennae, head, thorax and abdomen as in the male.
Expanse: 90–127 mm
The larva of this magnificent butterfly, according to Mr. Knyvett, feeds on Daphne nipalensis, but so far as I know, no description of it has been published. I am quite unable to separate the Sikkim form of this insect, even as a race. The points of difference between it and the Assam form are extremely variable, and the most prominent of these, viz. the paler tint of the grey area on the upperside of the hind wing in the female, is perhaps the most variable of all the characters. An Assam specimen of the female in the collection of the British Museum is far and away paler than any Sikkim specimen I have seen. Mr. Elwes says that in Sikkim this insect is only found in the forest region from about 6,000 to 10,000 feet (1,800 to 3,000 m) elevation, and that "it is most difficult to capture on account of its remarkably strong, rapid and dashing flight, and its habit of resting on high trees from which it flies only during a few hours of the morning" (Elwes, Trans. Ent. Soc. 1888, p. 421). The females are much scarcer than the males. I once saw a female on the wing and rather low down, in a clearing on the hill above the Rungarun Forest bungalow near Darjeeling. According to Col. Swinhoe, T. imperialis is common in the Khasia hills in Assam.

Distribution

The butterfly is found small pockets in Nepal, Bhutan and along the Eastern Himalayas in India (West Bengal, Meghalaya, Assam, Sikkim and Manipur). It is also found in northern Burma, northern Vietnam and in the Sichuan province of China. Mostly seen above 6,000 feet (1,800 m).

Status

The Kaiser-i-Hind is a local and rare butterfly which is protected by Indian and Nepalese law. Protection enforcement in these countries not being effective, it is hunted and collectors pay heavy prices.[3]:19
The two species of Kaiser-i-hind were listed in CITES Appendix II from 1987 onwards.[3]:5[4]
The Kaiser-i-hind would be a keystone species for conservation of high-altitude forest. Conservation in the Indian Union is complicated by the fact that most of the responsibility for conservation action runs at the state (province) level and not at the national level. There is a need for collecting more data in the habitat area and surrounding areas such as the adjoining mountain regions of China where the species is likely to occur.[3]:19

Habitat

The Kaiser-i-hind is a high altitude forest species[3]:19 which occurs at medium and higher elevations in the Himalayas from 6,000 to 10,000 feet (1,800 to 3,000 m) in well-wooded terrain[citation needed]. In the northeast of India, much of its forest habitat is degraded by jhoom cultivation; the butterfly is rarely found in the degraded patches.[3]:19

Habits

Very fast and strong flight. Flies at tree-top level until it chooses to descend if there is strong morning sunlight. When overcast, males are known to descend and sit on low vegetation, where it's disruptive, dull underside colouration makes it difficult to distinguish. Will remain so still that they have even been caught by hand in such circumstances. Females are known to fly in overcast and rainy weather also. Males visit damp patches and also suck moisture from leaves. Females rarely visit flowers or damp patches. Can be attracted by baiting. Often found on forest clearings and open spaces flanked by forests on hills and mountains. These are mostly males, who establish territories and aggressively drive away other intruding males, and stopping virgin females in search of mates.

Lifecycle

Flies in Sikkim in April and May and later in Manipur from May to July. Probably have two broods. The larvae feed on Magnolia campbellii (Magnoliaceae).
Eggs: Smooth, spherical, pale purplish red. Laid on underside of leaves.
Larva: Spindle shaped, green larva with broad heads and tapering tails. The larva has minute spines on the head and hair-like long spines on the segments.
Pupa: Resembles that of Graphium species. It has a smooth head and prominent dorsal horn. It has a green mesothorax and broad yellow dorsal zones on the abdomen.

Research

The iridescent green scaling on the wings of the Kaiser-i-hind are the subject of much research.[2][5][6] The three-dimensional photonic structure has been examined by transmission electron tomography and computer modelling to reveal naturally occurring "chiral tetrahedral repeating units packed in a triclinic lattice" (Argyros et al., 2001), the cause of the iridescence.[2]

See also

References

  1. Gimenez Dixon, M. 1996. Teinopalpus imperialis. In: IUCN 2006. 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. [www.iucnredlist.org]. Downloaded on 25 June 2007.
  2. Argyros, A.; Manos, S.; Large, M.C.J.; McKenzie, D.R.; Cox, G.C., and Dwarte, D.M. (2002). "Electron tomography and computer visualisation of a three-dimensional ‘photonic’ crystal in a butterfly wing-scale". Micron (Elsevier Science Ltd.) 33 (5): 483–487. doi:10.1016/S0968-4328(01)00044-0. PMID 11976036. Retrieved 28 October 2010.
  3. New, T. R.; Collins, N. Mark (1991). Swallowtail butterflies: an action plan for their conservation. IUCN/SSC Species Action Plans Series (illustrated ed.). Switzerland: IUCN SSC Lepidoptera Specialist Group. p. 36. ISBN 978-2-8317-0061-8.
  4. "Appendices I, II and III to CITES". Convention on International Trade on Endangered Species. As of 14 Oct 2010. Retrieved 23 September 2010. Check date values in: |date= (help). No mention found in the document.
  5. Ghiradella, Helen (1991). "Light and color on the wing: structural colors in butterflies and moths". Applied Optics 30 (24): 3492–3500. doi:10.1364/AO.30.003492. PMID 20706416.
  6. Michielsen, K.; Stavenga, D.G. (2008). "Gyroid cuticular structures in butterfly wing scales: biological photonic crystals". Journal of the Royal Society Interface 5 (18): 85–94. doi:10.1098/rsif.2007.1065. PMC 2709202. PMID 17567555.

Other sources

  • Erich Bauer and Thomas Frankenbach, 1998 Schmetterlinge der Erde, Butterflies of the world Part I (1), Papilionidae Papilionidae I: Papilio, Subgenus Achillides, Bhutanitis, Teinopalpus. Edited by Erich Bauer and Thomas Frankenbach. Keltern : Goecke & Evers ; Canterbury : Hillside Books ISBN 9783931374624 plate 9, figure 6
  • Collins, N.M. & Morris, M.G. (1985) Threatened Swallowtail Butterflies of the World. IUCN. ISBN 2-88032-603-6
  • Evans, W.H. (1932) The Identification of Indian Butterflies. (2nd Ed), Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai, India
  • Haribal, Meena (1994) Butterflies of Sikkim Himalaya and their Natural History.
  • Igarashi, S. (1987). "On the life history of the Teinopalpus imperialis in northern India and its phylogenetic position in the Papilionidae". Transactions of the Lepidoptera Society of Japan 38: 115–151.
  • Wynter-Blyth, M.A. (1957) Butterflies of the Indian Region. Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai, India.